In the case of crop vs full frame, a common measurement is to change the lens to maintain the field of view, e.g. 50 mm f4 on 1.6x crop aps-c, and 80 mm for full frame. Then photographers believe the f-ratio should be the same, so would use an 80 mm f/4. A 50 mm f/4 lens has an aperture diameter of 50 / 4 = 12.5 mm diameter. The new Canon 6D is another camera -- like the Nikon D600 -- designed to appeal to the photographer who wants to step up to full-frame but has found the $3,000-$3,500 price tag prohibitively The crop and the APS-C image will actually have shallower depth of field than the full frame image, if you view all three at the same size but, as I say, the full frame image will be a different enough photograph that the depth of field differences are the least of your problems. We can compare the 7D II to the Canon EOS 6D, the cleanest full frame camera that Canon produces, albeit two years older. (Not counting the Canon EOS 5DS, since it has a different purpose). And the 7D Mark II is just a hair noisier. But being noisier than its full frame brother is just physics at play. The pixel size is smaller. So it gathers The Canon 6D is a full frame camera. This is called the crop factor. A Canon APS-C camera has a crop factor of 1.6. So for any focal length you multiply what it says by 1.6. 8 Things I Learned Switching from a Crop Sensor to a Full-Frame Sensor - Improve Photography. 8 Things I Learned Switching from a Crop Sensor to a Full-Frame Sensor. Discussions abound concerning the pros and cons of a crop sensor dSLR versus a. Q4JNkj. I have been doing research trying to make the best buying decision that I can and have come across some puzzling information. I have three Canon digital bodies a 1Ds MkII, a 5D MkII, and a 50D. The first two bodies are full frame bodies and the third one is a crop sensor body. I am looking at Canon full frame lenses preferably the "L" lenses. 1. There is no adapter that lets you use a EF-S lens on an EF body without losing many of the advantages of gthe lens. The main problem is that the image the EF-S lens"projects" onto the sensor is too small and does not reach the edges of the large sensor in the full frame camera. BAK. Reply Reply with quote Reply to thread Complain. I'm shooting with an Irix 15mm 2.4 and get reasonable results, but also a tonne of noise - which is my biggest reason to want to jump to full frame. Is the low light performance of a full frame compared to a crop really that significant? I'm looking at buying a Canon 6D, as its got a great reputation for handling low light / high ISO scenarios. The 6D is full frame sensor camera while the 7D is crop sensor camera. 24mm on the 7D will have a 38mm FOV on a FF (6D) cameras. The 7D with 24-70 would not be ideal for landscapes. The 7D is more of a sports/wildlife camera with its high FPS, crop sensor, better AF, and build. The 7D is great a camera but can produce noisy images in low light. "As an example, canon 6d full frame has the highest resolution of 5472 x 3648 with a pixel aspect ratio of 3:2 . As this is the highest I assume this is utilising the full size of the sensor." Yes, and no. The actual sensor is slightly larger than the effective highest resolution. The sensor is 21 MP while the used area is 20 MB . That means Canon’s latest Digic X imaging engine works alongside a slightly redesigned 20.1MP full-frame CMOS sensor that, the manufacturer says, is “similar” to the one used in the sports DSLR.

canon 6d full frame or crop